Macroeconomic Resilience of Tanzania and Kenya

Macroeconomic Resilience of Tanzania and Kenya
Image: Getty, Tony Karumba

Both Tanzania and Kenya’s tax systems are overly complicated. Policy options to build resilience require simplifying the tax system by considering the EAC tax harmonisation agreement.

Summary:

  • Kenya and Tanzania are neighbouring middle-income countries, but Kenya’s economy is larger ($ 118.1 billion compared to Tanzania’s $ 76 billion).
  • Both countries are vulnerable to internal and external shocks. Since 2000 these have included frequent floods and droughts; the global financial crisis; the COVID-19 pandemic; and the Russia-Ukraine war.
  • The impact of the shocks was different: Kenya went into recession during the financial crisis and COVID-19. Tanzania avoided recession, partly because of reduced links to international financial markets and because no lockdown was imposed during COVID-19.
  • Both countries responded to the shocks using prudent monetary and fiscal policies that controlled inflation to target levels of 5%, by imposing interest and exchange control; releasing greater liquidity to the economy; restructuring private credit; and instituting social action provisions for vulnerable populations.
  • Key policy options to build resilience in the future include building fiscal capacity by simplifying the tax system; reducing or eliminating ill-designed exemptions and incentives which provide opportunities for corruption; making greater use of smart information management systems; broadening the tax base by plugging tax evasion loopholes and bringing the large informal sector into the tax net; strengthening institutions to build trustworthy, transparent governance structures that have the capacity to manage resources efficiently; formulating, implementing and enforcing sound policies and regulations; and respecting the rules and norms of economic interaction to avoid activities that erode public trust.
The views expressed in this publication/article are those of the author/s and do not necessarily reflect the views of the South African Institute of International Affairs (SAIIA).