Financing Africa’s Climate Goals: The Role of Fossil Fuel Subsidies and Environmental Taxes

Image: Getty, THEGIFT777
Image: Getty, THEGIFT777

African countries could unlock domestic climate funding by redirecting fossil fuel subsidies and environmental taxes, but their current use to stabilise energy prices leaves a major climate finance gap.

Summary

  • Africa faces a climate financing shortfall of 5% to 10% of GDP, with the carbo-intensive economies of North and Southern Africa contending with an even bigger financing gap.  
  • Fossil fuel subsidies and environmental taxes are potential sources of additional finance, constituting around 1.7% and 1.1% of Africa’s GDP, but their use in fuel or electricity price stabilisation limits climate mitigation funding.  
  • African countries must establish independent, self-financing and off-budget fuel and energy reserve authorities and redirect fossil fuel subsidy funding from pro-cyclical price management to climate mitigation.  
  • Africa’s largest, most energy-intensive and internally subsidised economies have more leeway for redirecting additional fiscal resources towards gearing in the climate transition.  
  • Countries must also review domestic financing commitments to Nationally Determined Contribution plans and introduce new environmental tax instruments with which to create national climate adaptation funds. 
The views expressed in this publication/article are those of the author/s and do not necessarily reflect the views of the South African Institute of International Affairs (SAIIA).

This content features on the G20 Resource Centre.