Development Aid for Infrastructure Investment in Africa: Malian Relations with China, the European Commission and the World Bank

Image: Flickr, PRORobin Taylor
Image: Flickr, PRORobin Taylor

This paper compares the terms of a selection of infrastructure aid contracts entered into by the government of Mali with both ‘traditional’ and ‘non-traditional’ donors.

It asks whether these forms of aid, conventionally considered to be dichotomous, are qualitatively different by employing primary research to consider the offers from a recipient government perspective. Taking the Chinese-funded third Bamako bridge as an entry point to the discussion, a simple investment model is employed to consider all development aid as part of a two-way agreement between donor (investor) and recipient (fund-raiser). Comparative risk and cost profiles are developed for the different donors. The paper concludes that the ways in which some African governments accept development aid from emerging economies such as China are influenced, firstly, by the particularities of infrastructure investment and, secondly, by pre-existing relations and partnering ideologies. The study of a stable African country with limited natural resources is an important addition to current literature, which has tended to be dominated by studies of unstable, resource-rich nations on the continent.

SAIIA sincerely thanks those who acted as peer reviewers for this paper.

1 Apr 2010

Download

File size: 153.91 KB

Research by
Series
SAIIA Occasional Paper, No 58, April 2010
Region
Asia Pacific, Europe & Central Asia, Sub-Saharan Africa
Country
China, European Union, Mali
SAIIA Programme
Foreign Policy
Tags
Bamako bridge, Infrastructure

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on whatsapp
Share on email
Scroll to Top